|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Section 1-1 Introduction: OCX-V-Plan History Section 1-1.1 Purpose of Introducing
V-Plan Alternative
In January of 1999, the founding partners of Russell Niewiarowski of Santa Ana Heights and Charles E. Griffin of Newport Beach founded The New Millennium Group (TNMG). TNMG, through the leadership of Mr. Griffin, a retired registered professional Control System Engineer with 47 years of automatic flight control systems experience, authored the OCX-V-Plan (Wildlands Ranch Alternative Runway Layout Plan) which became the final alternative included in the Countys EIR 573 for the reuse of MCAS El Toro in May 1999. TNMG introduced this alternative to the Orange County LRA for two reasons: The first being to provide a modern, safer and more efficient Airport Layout Plan to bring the 56-year old air station up to 21 century standards, and while doing so, to second, better mitigate adverse noise impacts to surrounding communities by utilizing nearly 30,000 acres of undeveloped Orange County Natural Communities Conservation Program (NCCP) Open Space Reserves contiguous with MCAS El Toro to the north and to the southwest for proposed flight paths which compliments, not conflicts with the existing Southern California airspace use. Also in 1999, a group of local commercial airline pilots headed by Captain Robert McGowan, United Airlines, Retired, formed the Airline Pilots for a Safer El Toro Airport (ALPSEA) group for the purpose of exploring a safer, more reasonable alternative airport plan for El Toro to resolve much of the controversial issues involving the countys proposed airport plan. ALPSEA devised the " Pilots Plan" alternative, similar to the V-Plans Phase 1. TNMG continues to assist the LRA in providing new information and studies as it pertains to the reuse of MCAS El Toro and the feasibility of the OCX-V-Plan in hopes of convincing the LRA to bring the best possible MCAS El Toro reuse plan forward which benefits Orange County, Southern California, and the nation. We recognize that the best reuse plan for MCAS El Toro is a commercial airport, yet we have long realized that the Countys current Preferred Project, based on the original 56-year old double-crossing east/west runways contains the wrong Airport Layout Plan (ALP) for OCX. Most of the cities in Orange County, both pro and anti-airport recognize this, hence opposition to the Countys Preferred Plan continues to grow steadily. In addition to several South County anti-airport cities who are threatened by the reality of over flights from OCX, many North County cities are now equally concerned with the potential of over flights and are contemplating withdrawing their support from the 14-City pro-airport Orange County Regional Airport Authority (OCRAA), currently headed by retired USMC Brigadier General Art Bloomer. Most of the opposition for OCX stems from safety and noise issues, compounded by the fact that the County continues to regularly change their proposed Airport Operating Plan which creates more uncertainty which instills less confidence in the County LRA. In a July 7, 2001 letter to the FAA, LRA Executive Director Gary Simon announced yet another new departure procedure for OCX involving a right turn for departures from Runways 35 to avoid conflicting with the congested airspace north of OCX. Originally in EIR 563, there was a proposed northerly departure that would make a left turn over heavily populated north county residents. Then in EIR 573, the County proposed a straight out north departure. Subsequently, a draft airspace analysis MITRE report submitted to the FAA confirmed that the Countys proposed straight-out northerly departures off Runways 35 would not be possible. Simon refers to the new proposed 40+ mile U-turn (right turn) departure procedure out to the Pacific Ocean as " efficient".
The County LRA under the leadership of Supervisor Charles Smith continues to object to a full feasibility study of the OCX-V-Plan alternative. To date, the county has provided virtually no documentation of noise contours nor detailed ALPs for the OCX-V-Plan to the public or within their EIR 573. The information that has been provided in EIR 573 on the plan is an informal review by means of negative comments slanted against the plan and claims that it would be less efficient than the Preferred Plan and would adversely impact more homes. The original V-Plan submitted to the County in 1999 has been substantially refined and more completely defined in public comments submitted to the county in response to EIR 573s Supplemental Analysis. Surprisingly though, the County has failed to acknowledge any of our recent Technical Reports, TERPS Studies and revised ALPs which address and answer each and every negative comment in EIR 573 on the V-Plan. The complete and current OCX-V-Plan Technical Reports and Graphics were submitted to the countys El Toro Master Development Program in response to the countys Supplemental Analysis to Draft Environmental Impact Report 573, and were published and circulated in Volume 15, Section I594, pages 02695 to 02830. The County LRA has responded to the media on several
occasions recently, stating that they would be willing to look at aviation
alternatives in depth once the MCAS El Toro property has been transferred
and the EIR 573 has been certified, but not until then. The way we see
it, the Countys EIR 573 remains incomplete because they did not
adequately address the OCX-V-Plan, and as such, we feel they will be faced
with endless litigation by South County until the county changes their
ALP to accommodate the less threatening and safer OCX-V-Plan.
In April of 2001, the majority of OCRAA Member cities stressed their interest in the V-Plan, and a derivative, the Pilots Plan, authored by OCRAA Member and retired commercial pilot Captain McGowan, Council Member for the city of Villa Park. Shortly thereafter, Villa Park announced their decision to withdraw from OCRAA after Supervisor Smith repeatedly disapproved of allowing any aviation alternatives to be studied. Other OCRAA Members stressed their support for Villa Parks actions and sent a letter to the County LRA to encourage them to allow the FAA to study the OCX-V-Plan/Pilots Plan alternatives. OCRAA Executive Director Art Bloomer sent the following letter to Mr. McGowan and Mr. Griffin: June 18, 2001 Dear Messrs. McGowan and Griffin: Based upon information received during the OCRAA Board meeting held on June 13, 2001, and direction to staff from the OCRAA Board, I am writing to inform you of the opportunity to submit your proposed arrival and departure procedures to the FAA for review, analysis and validation. From the information provided to OCRAA during this meeting, it is clear that the FAA allows any individual or organization, as opposed to just an airport operator, to act as a "proponent" for the development and submission of proposed arrival and departure procedures for any commercial airport, including the one proposed at El Toro. I see this as encouraging to your efforts. From my perspective, this appears to be the most feasible way to ensure that the plan you support receives an FAA evaluation and analysis at the same level of detail provided for in the plan supported by the LRA. There appear to be two courses of action available. You may submit your proposal directly to the FAA, or you may submit your proposal to the OCRAA Board for their consideration, and request that OCRAA forward your proposal to the FAA. In either case, I encourage you to consult with experts of your choice who are well versed in FAA procedures to ensure that your proposal is submitted with the proper information and in the proper form to enable a timely analysis, review and validation. I recommend that you consider a collaborative effort between the two of you to act as a single proponent. Given the aviation background you each possess, this should enhance your efforts in preparing a timely proposal. The Executive Director of the LRA, Gary Simon, has informed me that he concurs and supports this approach to obtain a detailed analysis of your proposal. Please feel free to call upon me if you have any questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, cc: OCRAA Board Members
ALPA Headquarters in Virginia sent the following e-mail to Mr. Griffin, distributed to the County LRA and OCRAA Members on June 13, 2001: From: "Mazor, John, Herndon" mazorj@ALPA.org The following statement is being forwarded to you at the request of Capt. Jon Russell, to be read at today's meeting: ALPA supports a topographical study of the terrain along the approach corridor and adjacent mountains at El Toro Airport to determine whether or not it would be feasible to operate Category 3 approaches with standard obstacle clearances. Furthermore, the runway would need to be long enough to support a widebody aircraft landing with adequate safety margins under a Category 3 landing. In ALPA's view, this would require an extension of the runway to the south across the railroad tracks. Therefore, ALPA urges the FAA to review the proposal set forth in The New Millennium Group proposal ("OCX-V") for operations on Runway 16. For the record, please note that ALPA's preferred solution still is to realign the runways to a northwesterly/southeasterly configuration. Captain Jon Russell
In April 2000 The New Millennium Group was invited to make a formal presentation of the V-Plan to the Airspace Users Working Group in Long Beach. The presentation was well received, and four months latter, the following internal e-mail was circulated within FAA: FAA e-mail obtained by Freedom of Information Act Author: Walter White at AWP500SCT, (Southern
California TRACON) Bud, I know that we are not allowed to comment on any of the alternatives and SCT will write the standard response saying thank you but it is not appropriate for us to comment. With respect to the other proposed El Toro layouts, the New Millennium Group plan initially appears to offer the most efficient level of integration with current traffic flows and thus potentially the highest level of safety and efficiency. Especially after our experience with the flight demonstration, I am concerned that the Airports Division is not going to let us comment on anything to do with El Toro. Thus we may eventually be stuck with an airport layout that, while it looks great by itself on paper, is virtually unusable from an integrated ATC standpoint SCT is ready to assist and support whatever the final layout is, however I do not look forward to the years of safety problems and litigation we might undergo as we work to fix a bad initial plan. Many of the plans reviewed to date have significant problems. We can help if we are allowed to. Have we made any progress on finding a way to allow Air Traffic Control knowledge and experience to be incorporated into the final product? As always any assistance you can provide would be greatly appreciated. Walter
In mid July 2001, Robert McGowan announced his interest
in joining The New Millennium Group as a Director and to assist in lobbying
efforts. In a relatively short time, we have gained support from several
Orange County cities for our OCX-V-Plan and continue to schedule meetings
and presentations with interested cities and Homeowners Association groups.
The
entire Engineering Section containing all section, is available on CD-ROM. page last
updated 6/23/05 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||